On Religion

Amish choices in Y2K

HINKLETOWN, Pa. – It was hard to see William and Minnie Stauffer in their traditional black clothes, since the only light inside the Pike Church came from a crimson winter sunset over the Amish Country hills.

It was hard to hear the story of how the Old-Order Mennonites came to Lancaster County, since there was no pulpit microphone the cold wooden pews were full of squirming young visitors. But it was easy to hear one of modernity's signature sounds, when a cellular telephone sang out over on the women's side of the sanctuary.

The children on this seventh-grade field trip giggled. Their host smiled.

"Feel free to take your call if you really need to," he told the chaperone. "We don't mind if you use your telephones. But you do need to go outside our church, to do that."

The present keeps threatening to drown out the past, like the trucks that shake this old church as they roar past a few feet away on Highway 322. It's getting harder for the minivans and SUVs to swerve around the horse-drawn buggies. Last year, some locals even faced Y2K complications, since tourists use credit cards, to the tune of $1.2 billion a year.

Many Amish have packed their wagons and moved to farms in more remote areas, far from the outlet malls. There are 20,000 traditional Amish left in the county, out of a population of 450,000. There are about 200,000 old-order Amish in America, living in 23 states.

Amish bishops face the ongoing challenge of discerning what to shun and what to embrace. It's OK to use a modern sewing machine, if it's powered by a special manual foot-pedal. Natural gas and air-compressors can work wonders, when connected to refrigerators, stoves and water pumps.

But if the Amish use modern banks, what about their ATM machines? Modern bicycles are forbidden, but what about roller blades? An Amish businessman may refuse to have an office telephone line. But can his non-Amish partner sit at a nearby desk and take calls on a cellular phone? Is it sinful to sell handmade quilts through a middleman at www.amish-heartland.com?

Amish parents used to worry about the subtle signals sent by buttons, bonnets and broaches or the intricate rites of courting using bachelor buggies to go to church socials.

Today, some teens see R-rated movies, go to beer bashes and blast out heavy-metal tunes in local bands, during the years before they make their life-defining decisions to join or to flee the church. This wild-oats tradition is called "rumschpringes," which, in the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect, means "running around." In 1997, press reports of drug abuse led to a shocking memo to Amish parents – warning them to study the details of their children's live, including looking for needle marks.

The times keep changing, but Amish young people still face the same choice, said Lena Zehr, a staff member at a Lancaster County museum called the Amish Farm. They know they cannot live the same lives as their 17th-century European ancestors or even of their parents and grandparents. But they still have to decide whether they will attempt to reject the standards of the modern world. She estimated the 90 percent join the church.

"Try to imagine what that would be like," said Zehr, facing another two busloads of children from the suburbs of Washington, D.C., or Baltimore, or Philadelphia, or Pittsburgh, or anywhere else, for that matter. "All your life, you have known that you were different. You were supposed to be separate from the world. Your clothes were different. Your home was different. If you are a little Amish girl, you look like your mother. If you are a little Amish boy, you look like your father."

The children looked around the bedroom in this archetypal Amish home, at the clothes, the quilts, the oil lamps and the old books. A sampler over the bed said: "Heaven is my home."

"If you are an Amish child you are always thinking: Do I want the modern things? Do I want that car? Do I want be one of the new people, one of the English? ... What would you choose? Can you even imagine making such a choice?"

Got those born-again feelings, again

Journalists rarely get to use terms such as "White House," New Age" and "seance" in the same story.

But they did in 1996, when the news broke that Hillary Rodham Clinton and her "sacred psychologist" Jean Houston were using meditation and visualization techniques to chat with Eleanor Roosevelt. Commentators smirked and said this behavior was wacky, if not "cult-like."

For scholar Wade Clark Roof, this ruckus was perfectly timed to aid his ongoing research into the Baby Boomer soul. Out in sanctuary pews and on suburban couches, Roof and his associates found that, as expected, the fundamentalist Protestants and Catholic traditionalists that he calls "Dogmatists" were outraged, while his "Secularists," "Metaphysical Seekers" and "Mainline Believers" were not.

The big news was that most "Born-Again Evangelicals" were taking the news in stride. As one born-again woman in North Carolina said, the first lady's rites were "a bit weird I must admit, but if that's what she wants and it helps her, that's what counts."

Hidden in his data is what Roof believes is a major trend. He is convinced there has been a seismic shift in America's spiritual landscape, one that has great implications for everyone from Oprah Winfrey to Billy Graham, from Al Gore to George W. Bush. To state it bluntly, the born-again label doesn't mean what it used to mean.

Consider, for example, reports that actress Jane Fonda is attending a Baptist church and has embraced the faith that her estranged husband Ted Turner once called a "religion for losers." From newspaper accounts, it seems clear she has had some kind of profound spiritual experience. She may, eventually, even call a press conference and say she has been born again. But this does not necessarily mean that Fonda, or any other born-again believer, has made radical changes in her personal convictions.

"It's crucial to understand that what unites most of the people who call themselves born-again Christians is their claim to have had a highly personal spiritual experience that has changed their lives," said Roof, whose most recent book is entitled "Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion."

"You are born again," he added, "because of certain feelings and emotions and experiences, not because you believe any particular set of doctrines or because you share certain beliefs about moral issues. ... Born-again Christians are increasingly becoming part of the American mainstream."

A third of America's 77-million Baby Boomers call themselves born-again Christians. According to Roof's most recent research, only 55 percent or so have any link to a conservative-Protestant denomination. In terms of their backgrounds, 38 percent grew up as evangelicals or fundamentalists, 28 percent as Catholics, 27 percent as mainline Protestants and another 7 percent as Jews or as members of some other harder-to-define group. Twenty percent say they are not members of a local congregation. Many prefer to watch religious television programs or attend a "house church" or another fellowship group.

Many born-again Boomers believe they have made a spiritual decision that is right for them, but not necessarily for everyone. Half affirmed that the various religions of the world are "equally good and true," and the younger the born-again Christian, the more likely he or she was to say this. A third of the born-again believers said they believe in reincarnation and astrology. And 48 percent of the born-again Christians said "yes" when asked, "Should a married woman who doesn't want any more children be able to obtain a legal abortion?"

As a rule, born-again Christians now join other Americans in saying they are "spiritual," rather than "religious." In the 1950s, said Roof, evangelicals tried to distance themselves from "liberal churches" and secular society. Today, increasing numbers of evangelicals want to make sure they are not seen as too doctrinaire or too judgmental and, thus, as fundamentalists.

"All of this is very American," said Roof. "Americans like new beginnings and new chances to start over. Being born again appeals to them. ... But Americans don't put much faith in institutions or traditions or doctrines. They aren't sure that they need a church. Americans believe in themselves and they trust their own experiences, more than anything."

Just another voice on the Metro

WASHINGTON – The elderly black woman began preaching moments after the train left the Capitol South subway station.

"Praise the Lord. It's a good day," she said, starting a 20-minute sermon as her rush-hour congregation rolled toward the Maryland suburbs.

Her voice was calm, strong and serious. She was carrying a cane and, I wouldn't dare make this up this detail, a fragrant box of spicy fried chicken. I didn't take precise notes, but what follows is real close to what she said. My father was a Southern Baptist preacher and I have a knack for remembering sermons.

"God's grace is real, but that doesn't mean you can just keep on sinning and sinning and sinning," she said, gazing straight ahead. "God is watching all the time. God sees all of you. ... Our God is a Holy God."

People kept their eyes down, reading their newspapers and paperbacks. A young black woman across the aisle giggled. "Oh no, it's church," she whispered to a friend. New riders glanced around in surprise, as they boarded the crowded car. But no one challenged the preacher or asked her to stop.

"God doesn't ask that much of us," she said. "He wants us to love each other and take care of each other and follow the commandments that are in His Word. Is that too much to ask?"

A youngster listening to rap on headphones said, "Preach it, sister." Surely the collision between the pounding music and the sermon was causing a storm in her head. At first she was amused. Then she began shooting daggers at the preacher with her eyes.

"I know what you're thinking," said the elderly woman. "You're saying, 'How are we supposed to know how we're supposed to live?' ... You know what the Bible says: 'For God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life.' You all know that verse, right?"

No one answered.

"Sweet Jesus is all the guide we need. But God also gave us his Word. You open up your Bible and read it and tell me that God hasn't made himself perfectly clear how we're supposed to live. The Bible is God's book. There's no other book like it. Some of you may go to church and you may read your Bible. But have you ever let it get inside you and change you? That's what I'm talking about. We've got to change on the inside. We've got to change how we live."

I moved to the Washington, D.C., area six months ago and I have, in that short time, seen many people reading worn-out Bibles on trains. But I think I have seen exactly one white person reading a Bible. I wonder how many white believers ride around in the political capital of the world looking at these faithful black Christians, wondering who they are, why they are marking up their Bibles, what churches they go to and why we seem to live in separate worlds.

Come to think of it, I haven't read my Bible on the Metro either. I wonder what this preacher would think of that? I was reading a stack of religion-news magazines and wearing a cross. I wondered: Was this good, or bad? Was I a fake, to her?

By the time we reached the last station, out by the Beltway, many people had left their seats and were lining up to exit – even quicker than normal.

The preacher brought her message to a close.

"What I'm saying is that God loves you and sent his Son to die for you. But I know that many of you are not listening," she said, still in her seat. "Maybe one person will go home tonight and think about what I am saying. Maybe God will touch one person's heart and they will go home and talk to their children about Jesus. Maybe one person will pray with their children tonight.

"That's why I'm saying what I'm saying. If one person hears the Word, then this is worth it. Just one person."

She was the last person to leave the train.

Intolerant Christians in the public square

As they lurched through a blinding snowstorm over Tokyo, the Rev. Billy Graham watched as the nervous pilot focused single-mindedly on his cockpit instruments.

When it came time to land that plane, the pilot and the air-traffic controllers followed a dogmatic set of rules. They were intolerant of errors, and Graham was thankful for that.

"I did not want these men to be broad-minded," he said, in a sermon that is currently circulating on the Internet. "I knew that our lives depended on it."

There are times, said the evangelist, when tolerance is bad. For centuries, Christians have proclaimed that the journey from earth to heaven is like any other difficult journey. It is crucial to have accurate directions and a trustworthy pilot, when souls are at stake. Thus, Jesus said: "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."

Jesus is intolerant, said Graham, when it comes to matters of salvation.

Try defending that stance on CNN. By the end of 1999, pundits and politicos were starting to suggest that evangelism equals hate speech.

The anonymous person who launched this text into cyberspace, with the title "Jesus was not tolerant," has a good memory and a nose for news. The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association's records indicate that this sermon was delivered in 1956, before being published as an evangelistic tract in 1957, 1984 and 1996.

The bottom line: If the world's most famous evangelist preached the same sermon today, it would make headlines and draw flack on the evening news. It would be hard to imagine anyone making a more inflammatory statement than the one attributed to Jesus in the Gospel of John: "He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him."

Questions about heaven, hell and salvation have been lurking between the lines of many news stories. Politicians want to bless new ties binding the government and "faith-based charities," so long as workers don't proselytize. GOP frontrunner George W. Bush said Jesus saved his soul and that other people may not understand what that means. Evangelical military chaplains have said they are being told to preach safe, non-judgmental sermons - or else.

While visiting India, Pope John Paul II said "there can be no true evangelization without the explicit proclamation of Jesus as Lord." The heir to Graham's pulpit - his son Franklin - angered many non-evangelicals when he urged non-Christians at the Columbine High School memorial service to turn to Jesus, before it was too late. The list goes on and on.

Leaders of the 15.8 million-member Southern Baptist Convention have repeatedly refused to cease their efforts to evangelize all non-Christians - including Jews, Muslims and Hindus. The interfaith Council of Religious Leaders of Metropolitan Chicago cried "foul" and said an upcoming Southern Baptist evangelistic push "could contribute to a climate conducive to hate crimes" in the city.

Asked about President Clinton's view of this controversy, press secretary Joe Lockhart said the Southern Baptist in the White House is convinced that one of the new century's major challenges will be "dealing with intolerance and coming to grips with the long-held resentments between religions. So I think he's been very clear in his opposition to whatever organizations, including the Southern Baptists, that perpetuate ancient religious hatred."

Southern Baptist leaders immediately cried "foul," accused Lockhart of being hateful and called for his resignation. The Rev. Morris Chapman, president of the SBC's executive committee, said: "It is the right of every person to agree or disagree with the internal doctrines of Christianity, but we believe for any governmental office to endeavor to pressure Christians to change their doctrines or practices is improper and reprehensible."

This conflict will not fade away.

There is no question that the First Amendment protects the free speech of non-Christians and others who are offended by intolerant, narrow-minded Christians who proclaim that Jesus is the only savior for all of humankind. Right now, the question appears to be whether Christian evangelists will retain their right to preach that message in the public square.